The chart meaning above and Agrippa's magical names are different kinds of information. Read the Sun planetary-magic page for its nature, numerical-square intelligence and source-specific angel lists.
Agrippa places solar images in the Sun's hour, with the Sun strong and rising, especially in Leo or its exaltation. He names ruby, diamond and carnelian as materials.
Agrippa connects the Sun with glory, victory and courage. Brightness and light mark many things in his solar list, from gold to plants that turn toward the Sun. His solar images are meant to bring honour and favour.
Summarized from Agrippa's account of the planet and the things he places under it.
Opinions, not this study's and not findings. These were published around 1900 by astrologers writing for a Theosophical readership, and most English astrology since has been reading them. They are quoted rather than restated so the distance stays visible, and each one names its astrologer and its page.
Sun in the first house
The Sun in the first house gives honour, glory, and long life; in the second much riches, but great extravagance; in the third good brethren and fortunate journeys;
Rosa Baughan, The Influence of the Stars,
p. 267 — T. Fisher Unwin, London, fourth edition, 1889
· Project Gutenberg, ebook 42889
Sun in the fourth house
Sun in the fourth house shows success at the end of life, realised ambitions, hopes and desires when the life is nearing the close. It denotes a good heredity with which pride of ancestry is connected. It promises gain by inheritance or some benefits coming through, ar by means of, the parentage.
Alan Leo, How to Judge a Nativity,
p. 166 — Modern Astrology Office, London, this printing 1928
· The 1928 printing, scanned
Sun in the fifth house
Sun in the fifth house denotes success in speculation and matters of enterprise, also gain through children, pleasure, society and entertainments. It is favourable for courtships and promises a successful and honourable attachment.
Alan Leo, How to Judge a Nativity,
p. 174 — Modern Astrology Office, London, this printing 1928
· The 1928 printing, scanned
Sun in the sixth house
THE Sun in the sixth house is not good for the health of the native, the vital forces of the Sun having less power while in this house, but unless afflicted the native is careful and generally knows how to safeguard his health.
Alan Leo, How to Judge a Nativity,
p. 180 — Modern Astrology Office, London, this printing 1928
· The 1928 printing, scanned
Sun in the seventh house
THE Sun in the seventh house in a male horoscope denotes a proud but honourable partner, and progress in life through marriage.
Alan Leo, How to Judge a Nativity,
p. 187 — Modern Astrology Office, London, this printing 1928
· The 1928 printing, scanned
Sun in the eleventh house
THE Sun in the eleventh house is a favourable position. It gives the good-will of elders, superiors, masters, those who are more powerful or of higher rank or standing than the native. If in business, he rises through association with these and benefits by them, even though they may not be his friends in the sense of manifesting affection for him.
Alan Leo, How to Judge a Nativity,
p. 218 — Modern Astrology Office, London, this printing 1928
· The 1928 printing, scanned
Leo's house book does not delineate every planet in every house, and this study refuses any passage whose scan has a word no dictionary holds. Where a house is not listed above, one of those two is why.
Who is quoted here, and who is not
Two astrologers, both writing around 1900:
Alan Leo, whose How to Judge a Nativity is the only
one of these books arranged as a lookup table — a paragraph per planet per
house — which is why everybody copied it; and Sepharial, who
arranged the same material by the question a reader brings rather than by
placement, so only a few of his judgements stand alone well enough to quote.
William Lilly is not here, and not because he was not asked.
Christian Astrology (1647) is the most important book in English on
the subject and this study holds it as a text already — but every scan of it is
long-s blackletter, and the OCR renders the title of its own first book as
“An Introduci ion to Aftrologje”. There is
nothing in it a reader could trust a quotation from. Ripley's
Compound of Alchymy and Anderson's Constitutions get
the same answer elsewhere in this study, for the same reason.
What the astrologers said about Sun in the signs
Opinions, not this study's and not findings. These were published around 1900 by astrologers writing for a Theosophical readership, and most English astrology since has been reading them. They are quoted rather than restated so the distance stays visible, and each one names its astrologer and its page.
Sun in Taurus
The Sun in Taurus will make the individual character behind each lunar expression more firm, plodding, enduring and determined, but there will be a tendency to move slower and act more cautiously, quietly and practically than when the Sun was in Aries. We have now the expression of the Sun from the exaltation of the Moon, and each combination will tend to strengthen the personality more than the individuality, which may often lay behind the personal expression.
the Sun in Gemini and when it is necessary or expedient to travel the person gains thereby physically and mentally. It gives a pleasant, affable disposition which makes him generally liked among his associates.
Max Heindel and Augusta Foss Heindel, The Message of the Stars,
p. 152 — The Rosicrucian Fellowship, Oceanside, this printing 1919
· The 1919 printing, scanned
Sun in Cancer
This is not a strong position for the individuality, therefore the personal characteristics may pull considerably away from the higher qualities. Tenacity, attachment and the clinging desire for objects are very marked.
This gives a practical individuality and a discriminative nature. It tends to lead the whole of the lunar expressions more into practical methods, where the discriminative faculties can be called out as fully as possible ; it also connects the personality with maternal and family affairs, the home instincts being strongly marked.
This gives a very harmonious individuality, with a tendency to act through perception more than through reflection. The spiritual qualities of the sign are called out, and the higher mind seeks to equalise all the various combinations of the Moon. There is a keen love of justice and great power of comparison, but there is also a certain sensitiveness in this sign, and very ambitious desires, especially on intellectual lines of thought and action.
The Sun in Scorpio, when well aspected, gives great energy, courage and independence.
Max Heindel and Augusta Foss Heindel, The Message of the Stars,
p. 153 — The Rosicrucian Fellowship, Oceanside, this printing 1919
· The 1919 printing, scanned
Sun in Scorpio
The Sun in the sign Scorpio gives a very firm, determined, and reserved individuality, with inclination to be very dignified, secretive, and full of desire. It gives pride to the individuality.
The Sun in Aquarius gives a very refined individuality, loving everything of a humanitarian nature, very faithful, sincere, humane and just, with very broad sympathies and a desire to embrace the whole of humanity. The individuality will be active in awakened souls, but in the younger members of the race it will not be manifest, and the personality will act as though no individuality were behind it.
The Sun in the sign Pisces tends to make the individual nature emotional and receptive, meditative and imitative. This is not the strongest of the twelve signs, but it gives a very deep internal nature, with strong inclinations towards occult development. There are two types of individuals under the sign Pisces, the developed and undeveloped.
Leo's sign book covers the Sun and the Moon and no other planet, so there is no Mercury in Aries here. Inventing one would be the only way to fill the gap.
Who is quoted here, and who is not
Two astrologers, both writing around 1900:
Alan Leo, whose How to Judge a Nativity is the only
one of these books arranged as a lookup table — a paragraph per planet per
house — which is why everybody copied it; and Sepharial, who
arranged the same material by the question a reader brings rather than by
placement, so only a few of his judgements stand alone well enough to quote.
William Lilly is not here, and not because he was not asked.
Christian Astrology (1647) is the most important book in English on
the subject and this study holds it as a text already — but every scan of it is
long-s blackletter, and the OCR renders the title of its own first book as
“An Introduci ion to Aftrologje”. There is
nothing in it a reader could trust a quotation from. Ripley's
Compound of Alchymy and Anderson's Constitutions get
the same answer elsewhere in this study, for the same reason.