Rank of spirit
Duke
One of the seven ranks the Goetia's appendix classifies its spirits under. 23 of the seventy-two hold it.
24 correspondences · 0 with an ancient or scriptural source · 0 with no source located
All the tables The ranks of spirit table
The oldest attribution here is Goetic rank of Agares, first attested 1600 CE.
Goetic rank of
-
Agares
Canonical- Who says so
- The Goetia's Classified List (compiled mid-17th century; this edition 1904)
- Earliest verified attestation
- 1600 CE
- Ancient or scriptural source
- Not yet investigated
- Evidence
- The source states it
The APPENDIX classifies this spirit, not its entry. The entries use rank words descriptively as well — Eligos appears 'in the form of a goodly Knight' — so a rank taken from the prose would invent titles the book does not give.
Evidence
-
Solomon, Lemegeton, Compiled mid-17th century from older material — Classified List of the 72 Chief Spirits
-
Aim
Canonical- Who says so
- The Goetia's Classified List (compiled mid-17th century; this edition 1904)
- Earliest verified attestation
- 1600 CE
- Ancient or scriptural source
- Not yet investigated
- Evidence
- The source states it
The APPENDIX classifies this spirit, not its entry. The entries use rank words descriptively as well — Eligos appears 'in the form of a goodly Knight' — so a rank taken from the prose would invent titles the book does not give.
Evidence
-
Solomon, Lemegeton, Compiled mid-17th century from older material — Classified List of the 72 Chief Spirits
-
Alloces
Canonical- Who says so
- The Goetia's Classified List (compiled mid-17th century; this edition 1904)
- Earliest verified attestation
- 1600 CE
- Ancient or scriptural source
- Not yet investigated
- Evidence
- The source states it
The APPENDIX classifies this spirit, not its entry. The entries use rank words descriptively as well — Eligos appears 'in the form of a goodly Knight' — so a rank taken from the prose would invent titles the book does not give.
Evidence
-
Solomon, Lemegeton, Compiled mid-17th century from older material — Classified List of the 72 Chief Spirits
-
Amdusias
Canonical- Who says so
- The Goetia's Classified List (compiled mid-17th century; this edition 1904)
- Earliest verified attestation
- 1600 CE
- Ancient or scriptural source
- Not yet investigated
- Evidence
- The source states it
The APPENDIX classifies this spirit, not its entry. The entries use rank words descriptively as well — Eligos appears 'in the form of a goodly Knight' — so a rank taken from the prose would invent titles the book does not give.
Evidence
-
Solomon, Lemegeton, Compiled mid-17th century from older material — Classified List of the 72 Chief Spirits
-
Astaroth
Canonical- Who says so
- The Goetia's Classified List (compiled mid-17th century; this edition 1904)
- Earliest verified attestation
- 1600 CE
- Ancient or scriptural source
- Not yet investigated
- Evidence
- The source states it
The APPENDIX classifies this spirit, not its entry. The entries use rank words descriptively as well — Eligos appears 'in the form of a goodly Knight' — so a rank taken from the prose would invent titles the book does not give.
Evidence
-
Solomon, Lemegeton, Compiled mid-17th century from older material — Classified List of the 72 Chief Spirits
-
Barbatos
Canonical- Who says so
- The Goetia's Classified List (compiled mid-17th century; this edition 1904)
- Earliest verified attestation
- 1600 CE
- Ancient or scriptural source
- Not yet investigated
- Evidence
- The source states it
The APPENDIX classifies this spirit, not its entry. The entries use rank words descriptively as well — Eligos appears 'in the form of a goodly Knight' — so a rank taken from the prose would invent titles the book does not give.
Evidence
-
Solomon, Lemegeton, Compiled mid-17th century from older material — Classified List of the 72 Chief Spirits
-
Bathin
Canonical- Who says so
- The Goetia's Classified List (compiled mid-17th century; this edition 1904)
- Earliest verified attestation
- 1600 CE
- Ancient or scriptural source
- Not yet investigated
- Evidence
- The source states it
The APPENDIX classifies this spirit, not its entry. The entries use rank words descriptively as well — Eligos appears 'in the form of a goodly Knight' — so a rank taken from the prose would invent titles the book does not give.
Evidence
-
Solomon, Lemegeton, Compiled mid-17th century from older material — Classified List of the 72 Chief Spirits
-
Berith
Canonical- Who says so
- The Goetia's Classified List (compiled mid-17th century; this edition 1904)
- Earliest verified attestation
- 1600 CE
- Ancient or scriptural source
- Not yet investigated
- Evidence
- The source states it
The APPENDIX classifies this spirit, not its entry. The entries use rank words descriptively as well — Eligos appears 'in the form of a goodly Knight' — so a rank taken from the prose would invent titles the book does not give.
Evidence
-
Solomon, Lemegeton, Compiled mid-17th century from older material — Classified List of the 72 Chief Spirits
-
Bune
Canonical- Who says so
- The Goetia's Classified List (compiled mid-17th century; this edition 1904)
- Earliest verified attestation
- 1600 CE
- Ancient or scriptural source
- Not yet investigated
- Evidence
- The source states it
The APPENDIX classifies this spirit, not its entry. The entries use rank words descriptively as well — Eligos appears 'in the form of a goodly Knight' — so a rank taken from the prose would invent titles the book does not give.
Evidence
-
Solomon, Lemegeton, Compiled mid-17th century from older material — Classified List of the 72 Chief Spirits
-
Crocell
Canonical- Who says so
- The Goetia's Classified List (compiled mid-17th century; this edition 1904)
- Earliest verified attestation
- 1600 CE
- Ancient or scriptural source
- Not yet investigated
- Evidence
- The source states it
The APPENDIX classifies this spirit, not its entry. The entries use rank words descriptively as well — Eligos appears 'in the form of a goodly Knight' — so a rank taken from the prose would invent titles the book does not give.
Evidence
-
Solomon, Lemegeton, Compiled mid-17th century from older material — Classified List of the 72 Chief Spirits
-
Dantalion
Canonical- Who says so
- The Goetia's Classified List (compiled mid-17th century; this edition 1904)
- Earliest verified attestation
- 1600 CE
- Ancient or scriptural source
- Not yet investigated
- Evidence
- The source states it
The APPENDIX classifies this spirit, not its entry. The entries use rank words descriptively as well — Eligos appears 'in the form of a goodly Knight' — so a rank taken from the prose would invent titles the book does not give.
Evidence
-
Solomon, Lemegeton, Compiled mid-17th century from older material — Classified List of the 72 Chief Spirits
-
Eligos
Canonical- Who says so
- The Goetia's Classified List (compiled mid-17th century; this edition 1904)
- Earliest verified attestation
- 1600 CE
- Ancient or scriptural source
- Not yet investigated
- Evidence
- The source states it
The APPENDIX classifies this spirit, not its entry. The entries use rank words descriptively as well — Eligos appears 'in the form of a goodly Knight' — so a rank taken from the prose would invent titles the book does not give.
Evidence
-
Solomon, Lemegeton, Compiled mid-17th century from older material — Classified List of the 72 Chief Spirits
-
Focalor
Canonical- Who says so
- The Goetia's Classified List (compiled mid-17th century; this edition 1904)
- Earliest verified attestation
- 1600 CE
- Ancient or scriptural source
- Not yet investigated
- Evidence
- The source states it
The APPENDIX classifies this spirit, not its entry. The entries use rank words descriptively as well — Eligos appears 'in the form of a goodly Knight' — so a rank taken from the prose would invent titles the book does not give.
Evidence
-
Solomon, Lemegeton, Compiled mid-17th century from older material — Classified List of the 72 Chief Spirits
-
Gremory
Canonical- Who says so
- The Goetia's Classified List (compiled mid-17th century; this edition 1904)
- Earliest verified attestation
- 1600 CE
- Ancient or scriptural source
- Not yet investigated
- Evidence
- The source states it
The APPENDIX classifies this spirit, not its entry. The entries use rank words descriptively as well — Eligos appears 'in the form of a goodly Knight' — so a rank taken from the prose would invent titles the book does not give.
Evidence
-
Solomon, Lemegeton, Compiled mid-17th century from older material — Classified List of the 72 Chief Spirits
-
Gusion
Canonical- Who says so
- The Goetia's Classified List (compiled mid-17th century; this edition 1904)
- Earliest verified attestation
- 1600 CE
- Ancient or scriptural source
- Not yet investigated
- Evidence
- The source states it
The APPENDIX classifies this spirit, not its entry. The entries use rank words descriptively as well — Eligos appears 'in the form of a goodly Knight' — so a rank taken from the prose would invent titles the book does not give.
Evidence
-
Solomon, Lemegeton, Compiled mid-17th century from older material — Classified List of the 72 Chief Spirits
-
Haures
Canonical- Who says so
- The Goetia's Classified List (compiled mid-17th century; this edition 1904)
- Earliest verified attestation
- 1600 CE
- Ancient or scriptural source
- Not yet investigated
- Evidence
- The source states it
The APPENDIX classifies this spirit, not its entry. The entries use rank words descriptively as well — Eligos appears 'in the form of a goodly Knight' — so a rank taken from the prose would invent titles the book does not give.
Evidence
-
Solomon, Lemegeton, Compiled mid-17th century from older material — Classified List of the 72 Chief Spirits
-
Murmur
Canonical- Who says so
- The Goetia's Classified List (compiled mid-17th century; this edition 1904)
- Earliest verified attestation
- 1600 CE
- Ancient or scriptural source
- Not yet investigated
- Evidence
- The source states it
The APPENDIX classifies this spirit, not its entry. The entries use rank words descriptively as well — Eligos appears 'in the form of a goodly Knight' — so a rank taken from the prose would invent titles the book does not give.
Evidence
-
Solomon, Lemegeton, Compiled mid-17th century from older material — Classified List of the 72 Chief Spirits
-
Sallos
Canonical- Who says so
- The Goetia's Classified List (compiled mid-17th century; this edition 1904)
- Earliest verified attestation
- 1600 CE
- Ancient or scriptural source
- Not yet investigated
- Evidence
- The source states it
The APPENDIX classifies this spirit, not its entry. The entries use rank words descriptively as well — Eligos appears 'in the form of a goodly Knight' — so a rank taken from the prose would invent titles the book does not give.
Evidence
-
Solomon, Lemegeton, Compiled mid-17th century from older material — Classified List of the 72 Chief Spirits
-
Uvall
Canonical- Who says so
- The Goetia's Classified List (compiled mid-17th century; this edition 1904)
- Earliest verified attestation
- 1600 CE
- Ancient or scriptural source
- Not yet investigated
- Evidence
- The source states it
The APPENDIX classifies this spirit, not its entry. The entries use rank words descriptively as well — Eligos appears 'in the form of a goodly Knight' — so a rank taken from the prose would invent titles the book does not give.
Evidence
-
Solomon, Lemegeton, Compiled mid-17th century from older material — Classified List of the 72 Chief Spirits
-
Valefor
Canonical- Who says so
- The Goetia's Classified List (compiled mid-17th century; this edition 1904)
- Earliest verified attestation
- 1600 CE
- Ancient or scriptural source
- Not yet investigated
- Evidence
- The source states it
The APPENDIX classifies this spirit, not its entry. The entries use rank words descriptively as well — Eligos appears 'in the form of a goodly Knight' — so a rank taken from the prose would invent titles the book does not give.
Evidence
-
Solomon, Lemegeton, Compiled mid-17th century from older material — Classified List of the 72 Chief Spirits
-
Vapula
Canonical- Who says so
- The Goetia's Classified List (compiled mid-17th century; this edition 1904)
- Earliest verified attestation
- 1600 CE
- Ancient or scriptural source
- Not yet investigated
- Evidence
- The source states it
The APPENDIX classifies this spirit, not its entry. The entries use rank words descriptively as well — Eligos appears 'in the form of a goodly Knight' — so a rank taken from the prose would invent titles the book does not give.
Evidence
-
Solomon, Lemegeton, Compiled mid-17th century from older material — Classified List of the 72 Chief Spirits
-
Vepar
Canonical- Who says so
- The Goetia's Classified List (compiled mid-17th century; this edition 1904)
- Earliest verified attestation
- 1600 CE
- Ancient or scriptural source
- Not yet investigated
- Evidence
- The source states it
The APPENDIX classifies this spirit, not its entry. The entries use rank words descriptively as well — Eligos appears 'in the form of a goodly Knight' — so a rank taken from the prose would invent titles the book does not give.
Evidence
-
Solomon, Lemegeton, Compiled mid-17th century from older material — Classified List of the 72 Chief Spirits
-
Zepar
Canonical- Who says so
- The Goetia's Classified List (compiled mid-17th century; this edition 1904)
- Earliest verified attestation
- 1600 CE
- Ancient or scriptural source
- Not yet investigated
- Evidence
- The source states it
The APPENDIX classifies this spirit, not its entry. The entries use rank words descriptively as well — Eligos appears 'in the form of a goodly Knight' — so a rank taken from the prose would invent titles the book does not give.
Evidence
-
Solomon, Lemegeton, Compiled mid-17th century from older material — Classified List of the 72 Chief Spirits
Seal metal
-
Copper
Canonical- Who says so
- The Goetia's Classified List (compiled mid-17th century; this edition 1904)
- Earliest verified attestation
- 1600 CE
- Ancient or scriptural source
- Not yet investigated
- Evidence
- The source states it
The metal this rank's seal is to be made in, stated in the appendix.
Evidence
-
Solomon, Lemegeton, Compiled mid-17th century from older material — Classified List of the 72 Chief Spirits